Ireland paid private operators almost €1.1 billion for international-protection accommodation in 2024, and roughly €1.6 billion in 2025. Almost a quarter of the 2024 spend went to just seven companies, each earning more than €20m. The State’s own auditor has documented that, in a sample of twenty properties, signed contracts were missing for half of them, evidence of planning was on file for four, and a lease could be produced for one. Across the whole portfolio at the end of 2024, 161 of 325 centres — housing 13,785 people — had no in-date contract; the State could not even record the contractual status of 101 of them. A single provider overcharged the system €7.4m in VAT using three different VAT registration numbers. Most of the largest operators have converted to unlimited company status, putting their accounts out of public reach. Tifco, the State’s third-largest accommodation supplier, is ultimately owned by the US private-equity giant Apollo Global Management via a Luxembourg holding. Mosney, paid roughly €200m since 2002, sits behind an Isle of Man parent. The State is now being sued by five providers it backed out on. This is not a feature of an immigration policy. It is a parallel procurement economy. We are going to follow the money.

This is a stub. v0.2 published 11 May 2026. Every named figure, contract value, ownership chain and allegation on this page is sourced to credible Irish reporting, the Comptroller and Auditor General’s Report on the Accounts of the Public Services 2024 (Chapter 10), Oireachtas record, or open court proceedings. New named cases are added only when verified. If you are named on this page and want to respond, see Right of reply below.

1. The numbers

The headline figures are not contested. They come from the Department of Justice itself, from the Comptroller and Auditor General, and from the Public Accounts Committee.

€1.1 bn paid by the State for international-protection accommodation in 2024 (€978m of that to commercial providers). Source: C&AG Chapter 10, para 10.14.
€1.6 bn paid to private accommodation providers in 2025 alone. Source: Department of Justice, told to PAC April 2026.
€230 m paid to just seven companies in 2024 — 24% of total spend — each earning more than €20m. Source: C&AG Chapter 10, para 10.19.
8x IPAS accommodation expenditure rose more than eightfold between 2019 and 2024. Source: C&AG Chapter 10.
€92 vs €34 average cost per night to accommodate an applicant in privately provided accommodation versus State-owned accommodation in 2024. Source: C&AG Chapter 10, para 10.18 (derived from IGEES, June 2025).
€148.2 m price the State has now agreed to pay to acquire Citywest outright — after years of also paying its operator hundreds of millions to use it. Source: Irish Examiner, December 2025.

The 2025 single-year spend on private operators (€1.6bn) is, by the Irish Examiner’s long-run accounting, of the same order of magnitude as the entire previous twenty years of direct provision contracts combined. A two-decade procurement programme compressed into twelve months — and accelerating.

2. The disclosure black hole

Most of the top IPAS contractors are private companies. Several of the largest are something quieter than that: unlimited companies. Under Irish company law, unlimited companies are not required to file annual accounts in the Companies Registration Office in the way limited companies are. They take the State’s money in public, and they account for it in private.

Documented conversions among large or growing IPAS-sector operators:

  • Cape Wrath Hotel Unlimited Company — operator of Citywest, the State’s single largest accommodation centre. Unlimited.
  • Mosney Unlimited Company — County Meath, paid roughly €200m since 2002. Unlimited (and routed through the Isle of Man — see case file D).
  • Millstreet Equestrian Services — converted to unlimited status in 2010. Its last published accounts (2018) showed turnover of €8.6m and pre-tax profits of €2.36m. Nothing has been required to be published since.
  • East Coast Catering — converted to unlimited status in 2011.

This is legal. It is also a policy choice the State has not, so far, pushed back on when awarding contracts. A nine-figure procurement programme is, in effect, being run through a class of supplier whose accounts the State pays for but does not see published.

3. What the State’s own auditor found

The Comptroller and Auditor General is the State’s statutory external auditor. In the 2024 Report on the Accounts of the Public Services, published on 30 September 2025, Chapter 10 is titled Management of international protection accommodation contracts. The full chapter runs to several dozen pages. Direct findings, in the auditor’s own words:

  • “The IPAS incurred expenditure of almost €1.1 billion on the provision of accommodation and related services to IP applicants in 2024.” (10.14)
  • “Almost €230 million (24%) of this was paid to just seven commercial providers, each receiving in excess of €20 million.” (10.19)
  • “The average cost per night in 2024 to accommodate an IP applicant in privately provided (mostly emergency) accommodation was €92 compared with €34 for State-owned.” (10.18)
  • “Signed contracts covering payments in 2024 were not available for 10 of the 20 properties (50%) reviewed by the examination team.” (10.36)
  • “Insurance certificates were only available for eight of the properties (40%).” (Figure 10.6)
  • “Evidence provided for just one property (5%) by way of a lease agreement.” (Figure 10.6)
  • “The provider had overcharged the IPAS for VAT totalling €7.4 million... The provider has refunded amounts totalling €1.5 million to date.” (10.59)
  • “Four payments included VAT charges totalling €884,000 for the accommodation element of the invoice, even though the accommodation provision is VAT exempt.” (10.57)
  • “The IPAS was being overcharged by at least €15,000 each month” (in one named instance, three contracted rooms not in use). (10.60)
  • “By late August 2025, the IPAS has identified further overpayments, totalling around €5.1 million from contract non-compliances in around ten cases.” (10.117)
  • “Bunk beds were in use for adults in three centres in apparent contravention of the national standards.” (10.43)
  • “Payments were being made on non-contractual terms, and the capacity of the IPAS to properly verify... the agreed service delivery was undermined.” (10.36)

And the finding that the headline coverage understated. At the end of 2024:

161 of 325 accommodation centres — housing 13,785 IP applicants — had no in-date signed contract with the State.
101 further centres on which the IPAS could not even record the contractual status. Source: C&AG Chapter 10, para 10.33.

Two-thirds of the State’s IPAS portfolio, at the end of the most-expensive twelve months in the system’s history, was running outside an active signed contract or with no contract-status record at all. The five recommendations the C&AG made — complete due diligence per property, signed contracts countersigned by an IPAS official, pre-payment capacity and VAT checks, secure transfer of personal registers, and proof of change-of-use applications — were all marked “Agreed” by the accounting officer, and most marked “Implemented, Q3 2025.”

(Note: the C&AG chapter anonymises the seven providers paid >€20m as “A” to “G”. The named case files below come from credible-outlet reporting and court records, not from the audit.)

4. Six named case files

The pattern is not abstract. Six public, court-recorded or credible-outlet-reported case files give it a face. Each case here is sourced to at least two credible Irish outlets and / or open court proceedings.

Case file A — Dundrum House Hotel and the Spanish nominee

The Dundrum House Hotel in Tipperary became an IPAS centre under a contract dated November 2024 between the Department of Integration and a company called Utmasta. On paper, the sole shareholder of Utmasta was a Spanish woman based in Palma. In open High Court proceedings in late 2025, it was put to Jeffrey Leo, a US businessman who had bought Dundrum House a decade earlier, that he and his wife held a 50% beneficial interest in Utmasta in trust — a fact, the court was told, that he had “sought to conceal.” In April 2026 the High Court quashed the planning exemption that underpinned the centre’s asylum-accommodation use. The Taoiseach subsequently confirmed Dundrum House would remain an IPAS centre regardless of the ruling.

What this case file shows is not what one businessman did. It is what the State’s contract paperwork did not show. The C&AG’s “ownership verification” finding is not abstract; this is what an ownership-verification failure looks like in practice. Sources: thejournal.ie (September and November 2025); Irish Examiner court coverage.

Case file B — Allpro Security Services Ireland Ltd

Allpro Security Services Ireland Ltd is owned 50/50 by Conor Nolan and Alan Connolly, through their vehicle Be Rite Group Ltd, both men from Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. On 15 June 2022 both resigned as directors of Allpro. Three weeks later, both pleaded guilty at Galway Circuit Criminal Court to tax offences — specifically failures to remit employer’s PAYE and VAT in respect of directorships in other companies. Mr Connolly pleaded guilty to seven sample offences; Mr Nolan to six. Each was fined €2,000. Both men remain 50% shareholders of Allpro. Day-to-day directors are now Rachel McHugh and Christopher Moore.

In the same period the firm’s State business multiplied. Allpro received approximately €19.6 million from the State in 2023 for international-protection and refugee accommodation. In the twelve months to March 2024 the company’s pre-tax profits rose seven-fold, from €1.6 million to €12.28 million. Source: Irish Times, 13 May 2024.

The editorial point is not that the men were named in the headlines. It is the due-diligence question for the Department: at the same time State payments to this contractor were multiplying, two of its 50% shareholders were going through a Circuit Court guilty plea on tax matters. What did the procurement process know, and when did it know it?

Case file C — IGO Cafe Ltd

IGO Cafe Ltd, trading as IGO Emergency Management Services, is a Dún Laoghaire-based company co-owned by directors Ann Murphy and Cristina Andries. It received approximately €29.9 million (inclusive of VAT) from the State in the second half of 2024 alone for International Protection accommodation. In the most recent reported financial year the two directors paid themselves a combined €4.68 million. Source: RTÉ, 23 May 2025.

The arresting figure is not the €4.68m. It is the trajectory. The company’s prior published accounts showed pre-tax profits of just over €2,000. A former café became one of the State’s mid-tier IPAS contractors inside two years. Either the State’s procurement system is uniquely generous to cafés-turned-centres, or this category of contractor was scaled up faster than the audit function could keep up with.

Case file D — Mosney, the McCloskeys, and an Isle of Man holding company

Mosney is a former Butlins holiday camp on the north Meath coast. The McCloskey family bought it from Butlins in 1982 and converted it to a direct-provision centre in 2001, accommodating around 600 international-protection applicants. Since 2002, payments to Mosney from the Irish State for direct-provision and IPAS services total close to €200 million (Gript / Irish Times). The operating company is Mosney Unlimited Company; under Irish company law, unlimited companies are not required to publish annual accounts.

The ownership above the trading company is where the story sits. Mosney Unlimited is 96.67% owned by El Molino Hotels Unlimited Company, with three further 1.11% shareholders (Paul McCloskey, Ruth Kierans, Sarah Gates). El Molino Hotels in turn has two shareholders: Sonning Unlimited, a company registered in the Isle of Man, and Tymon Company Secretaries Ltd. Sarah Gates-McCloskey and Phelim McCloskey were appointed as directors of Sonning Unlimited on 27 April 2016 (Irish Times / Avondhu Press).

Separately, the operating company has been a documented financial donor to a sitting Irish political party. The McCloskey-run Mosney operation contributed €6,500 to Fianna Fáil in 2008 and a further €4,050 to Fianna Fáil and €1,000 to Ireland for Europe (Lisbon Treaty campaign) in 2009, per the Standards in Public Office returns reported by the Irish Examiner.

This is not a finding of wrongdoing. It is a structural finding. A direct-provision centre that has received close to €200m of Irish public money over twenty-plus years is operated through an unlimited Irish company whose accounts are not published, owned through an Isle of Man parent, by a family that has also been a documented financial donor to a party of government. Every individual link in that chain is legal. Whether the assembled chain is what the Irish taxpayer thought they were funding when the cheques were written is a separate question.

Case file E — Citywest, Cape Wrath, and Tetrarch Capital

Citywest is Ireland’s largest single asylum-accommodation centre — a 764-bed Dublin hotel and convention complex. Its operating company is Cape Wrath Hotel Unlimited Company. Cape Wrath is owned by Alva Glen Investments Limited; the largest shareholder in Alva Glen (38.87%) is Tetrarch Capital Limited, a Dublin real-estate platform founded in 2011 by Michael McElligott and James Byrne. Tetrarch is itself owned in equal thirds by three holding companies: Tamzin Limited, Brayden Limited and Kilgore Investments. The acquisition by Tetrarch (via Alva Glen) of sole control of Citywest and Cape Wrath was cleared by the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission in 2017. (Source: CCPC determination M/17/064; SoloCheck; Irish Examiner.)

The Citywest revenue line is the steepest single curve in the IPAS economy. Hotel revenues went from €16.2m in 2021 to €48.28m in 2022 (almost a threefold increase, driven by the Ukrainian accommodation deal) and to €70.86m by 2024 — making Cape Wrath the largest single accommodation supplier to the State. Operating profit at the Citywest centre was reported at €17.5m in a single year (RTÉ / Irish Examiner, December 2025).

And the final move. The State has now agreed to acquire Citywest outright for €148.2 million (Irish Examiner, December 2025). On any view, that is a structurally striking outcome: the Department of Justice paid the operator hundreds of millions to use the property over multiple years; the operator’s revenue tripled and its profit hit eight-figure territory; and the State has then bought the asset at the top of the curve. The open question is the netting — what proportion of the operator’s prior years of State payments effectively reduces the headline acquisition price? On the available record, that calculation has not been published.

Case file F — Tifco, Travelodge Plus, and Apollo Global Management (via Luxembourg)

Tifco Hotel Group is Ireland’s second-largest hotel operator. It owns or operates the Crowne Plaza Dublin Airport, Crowne Plaza Blanchardstown, the Hilton at Kilmainham and Charlemont Place, the Travelodge brand in Ireland, and a number of other properties. In 2018 Tifco was sold by Goldman Sachs to the US private-equity giant Apollo Global Management in a deal reported at up to €600 million (Irish Examiner / Irish Times / Fora.ie).

The ownership chain from the Irish trading company to the ultimate US parent runs through Luxembourg. Per Irish Times reporting (May 2023): Tifco Ltd is owned by Bohrmount Ltd; Bohrmount is owned by Trident Bidco Designated Activity Company; Trident Bidco is owned by Trident Midco DAC; Trident Midco is owned by Trident Topco DAC; and Trident Topco is 99.83% owned by AEPF III 38 S.à.r.l., a Luxembourg-registered Apollo vehicle. Pumkinspice Limited — the legal name of the company operating the Travelodge Plus brand — is 89% owned through the same Luxembourg structure. Listed directors include Tifco CEO Enda O’Meara, CFO Brian Campion, and Patrick Mabry of Lapithus, a Luxembourg-based asset-management firm tied to Apollo.

State payments to the Apollo-owned group are documented. The Department paid €21 million to Tifco and €10.6 million to Pumkinspice Limited in 2023. Tifco was paid a further €16 million for asylum-seeker accommodation “and/or related costs” between January and September 2024. Travelodge (Tifco) received €24.9 million in the first three quarters of 2024, making it the third-largest single recipient of State accommodation payments in that period. In Q1 2025, Tifco Ltd received a further €3.6 million. The Travelodge Plus Dublin alone was reported as commanding the equivalent of roughly €1.2 million per month in State payments at full IPAS occupancy (Irish Times).

This is not the smaller end of the IPAS economy. This is one of the world’s largest private-equity groups, on the Apollo end of the chain, receiving Irish taxpayer money to house Irish-State asylum applicants in Irish hotels — through a Luxembourg holding structure. The Irish State has not, to date, published a public assessment of the value-for-money implications of contracting on this scale with vehicles whose ultimate parent is a US listed alternative-asset manager.

5. The offshore-and-PE architecture, at a glance

Three of the six case files above describe the same structural pattern: a top-of-the-table IPAS provider whose operating company sits below an opaque or offshore holding layer.

  • Tifco Hotel Group → Bohrmount Ltd → Trident Bidco DAC → Trident Midco DAC → Trident Topco DAC → AEPF III 38 S.à.r.l. (Luxembourg) → Apollo Global Management (United States).
  • Mosney Unlimited Company → El Molino Hotels Unlimited Company → Sonning Unlimited (Isle of Man).
  • Cape Wrath Hotel Unlimited Company (Citywest) → Alva Glen Investments Limited → Tetrarch Capital Limited (Tamzin Limited / Brayden Limited / Kilgore Investments, equal thirds).

Each of the three is legal. Each of the three is also structurally significant in its own way: a US private-equity giant via Luxembourg; an Isle of Man parent above an unlimited Irish operating company; and a domestic real-estate platform held through three single-purpose holding companies, all sitting above an unlimited operating subsidiary. None of these structures appear in the C&AG’s anonymised “Provider A to Provider G” columns. But they are the architectural reality of the largest end of the Irish IPAS procurement system.

6. Today’s news: the State is being sued

The Irish Times reported on 11 May 2026 that five High Court proceedings have been initiated against the Department of Justice between 2025 and 2026 by accommodation providers, after the Department entered into pre-contract arrangements and then walked away. Two of the five have been settled; three remain before the courts. The Department’s secretary general, Doncha O’Sullivan, told the Public Accounts Committee in writing that disclosing settlement amounts could limit the State’s defence in ongoing cases.

The PAC chairman, John Brady TD (Sinn Féin), called the position “deeply concerning” and said similar litigation cited compensation “running into the millions, for refurbishment works carried out and contracts not honoured.” He has asked the Minister for Justice, Jim O’Callaghan, to clarify the scale of the financial risk, the cost of cases already settled by mediation, and how many further cases are at pre-litigation stage.

What that means in practice: the same procurement system the C&AG documented as missing planning permissions, ownership verification and routine invoice checks is now exposed to undisclosed multi-million-euro liabilities on contracts it changed its mind about. The exposure has not been quantified. The PAC has not been given the numbers. Source: Irish Times, 11 May 2026.

7. The political conflict-of-interest axis

The “follow the money” beat is not selective. The same standard applies to politicians criticising the system as to the contractors running it, and to politicians benefiting from contractor donations as to politicians receiving direct payments. Two documented Irish instances in the public record, both named here.

First. In December 2023 the investigative outlet The Ditch reported that Pa Daly TD, Sinn Féin’s justice spokesperson, was receiving €800 per month tax-free under the Accommodation Recognition Payment for housing a Ukrainian refugee in his second home in Dublin. Mr Daly confirmed the payment. He had, the same day, told the Dáil that providers were “cashing in” and making “huge amounts of money” from refugee accommodation. The Accommodation Recognition Payment is a State scheme distinct from IPAS contracts but it is the same procurement principle: State money paying private property owners to house people the State is responsible for.

Second. As set out in case file D above, the Mosney operation — cumulative State receipts close to €200m since 2002 — was a documented financial donor to Fianna Fáil in 2008 (€6,500) and again in 2009 (€4,050), per Standards in Public Office returns. Fianna Fáil has been the senior or junior coalition partner across most of the period during which State payments to Mosney were made. Documented political donations from State accommodation providers to a sitting party of government are a distinct conflict-of-interest pattern from Mr Daly’s — but they are part of the same beat.

We are not extrapolating from two named cases to a pattern of every TD or party. We are naming the documented ones. The wider question — how many sitting TDs, councillors, senior officials and parties have, since 2002, received payments or donations connected to State asylum-accommodation contractors — is on the open-questions list below.

8. What we do not yet know

This is a stub. The point of opening it now is that the next phase of the investigation is the work to close these out.

  1. Beneficial ownership of the rest of the top ten operators. Six are now mapped on this page (Cape Wrath / Allpro / IGO Cafe / Utmasta / Mosney / Tifco). The remaining four require the same treatment via CORE, OpenCorporates and court records. The CRO Open Data Portal API key (applied for, pending) accelerates this.
  2. Offshore parents we have not yet mapped. Three of the top operators on this page run through Luxembourg or the Isle of Man. How many of the next four do the same? Jersey, BVI and Cayman are the natural next-look jurisdictions.
  3. The five litigant providers. Court proceedings in the High Court are public. The names should be reachable from court lists. Mediated cases are private — but the PAC may force disclosure.
  4. The Citywest €148.2m purchase netting. What proportion of the operator’s prior years of State payments effectively reduces the headline acquisition price? Is the purchase a buy-out, or a top-up?
  5. The “renegotiated for improved value” line in Doncha O’Sullivan’s letter. How much was renegotiated, by how much, with which providers? Freedom-of-information and Parliamentary Question territory.
  6. HIQA inspection coverage versus the C&AG’s ownership-verification failures. HIQA only received inspection powers in mid-2024 and reported on 82% of centres in 2024 (C&AG Chapter 10). How many of the 161 contract-less centres have actually been HIQA-inspected to date?
  7. The 4,500 empty beds vs 500 men sleeping rough reported to PAC in April 2026. C&AG (10.78) found 22-39% vacancy at site-visited centres. Is the State paying for unused capacity under contractual minimum-occupancy clauses?
  8. The Department of Children → Department of Justice handover. The IPAS portfolio transferred from one department to another on 1 May 2025. What contractual obligations transferred with it? Were any forgotten or renewed unread?
  9. The whistleblower regime. In April 2025 the Whistleblowers’ Ombudsman called the system for investigating wrongdoing in IPAS centres “unacceptable.” What channels exist now?
  10. The two-tier accommodation system identified by RTÉ in March 2026. With C&AG’s €92 vs €34 per-night gap now confirmed, the question is the variance within the €92 commercial tier. Per-bed audit needed.

9. If you know something

The Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General audits a sample. The Public Accounts Committee can only ask the questions it knows to ask. Reporters can only chase the leads they can name. If you work inside the IPAS contracting system — in a Department, in HIQA, in an inspecting body, in a contractor, or in one of the centres — and there is something the published record does not yet show, we want to hear from you.

Contact: kalijunasurfingclub@gmail.com. Encrypted contact details will be added to this page in v0.3. We treat sources confidentially. We do not publish anything we cannot verify.

10. Right of reply

If you are a named individual, company or Department in any version of this page and you want to respond — correction, denial, additional context, or formal statement — write to kalijunasurfingclub@gmail.com. Responses received from named parties will be carried on this page beneath the relevant case file, in full and unedited where length permits. Documented corrections will be made within 48 hours of verification.

Nothing on this page is a finding of dishonesty or criminality against any person not already convicted in open court. Cases described as before the courts are described as such. Allegations put to a person in cross-examination are reported as such and not as fact. Ownership chains are described as they appear in credible Irish credible-outlet reporting and on the Companies Registration Office record. Where this page falls short of that standard, the right-of-reply line is the correction.

Get the weekly briefing

This investigation moves week to week. The weekly briefing carries the new contract numbers, the new PAC sessions, the new C&AG references, in your inbox on Mondays.

Sources

Related on this site