Masuma Sohrabi was 31 years old, Iranian, a mother of two whose children attended Scoil Mhuire primary school in Clifden. She had come to Ireland in October 2024 and was living at Waterloo House, an IPAS accommodation centre in Connemara. She was afraid. She went to An Gardá Síochána and reported the man she feared. She went to court and secured a protection order placing legal restrictions on him. The IPAS system’s response was to move him to accommodation in Co. Mayo. On the morning of 29 May 2026, Masuma Sohrabi was found dead near Waterloo Bridge on the outskirts of Clifden, with fatal slash and stab wounds. The man charged with her murder is Ali Sohrabi, 35, an asylum seeker who had arrived at the IPAS centre with wounds to his own neck that morning before leading Gardáí to her body. She had done everything the system asked of her. The system failed her completely.

What happened in Clifden

The Irish Times reported that Masuma Sohrabi had previously sought a court order placing restrictions on the man who had been abusing her. She and the man she feared had been living at Waterloo House IPAS centre at the same time. When she secured the court order, he was ordered to leave. He was not removed from the IPAS network. He was transferred to accommodation in Co. Mayo — a different county, not a different system.

In the weeks before her death, Sohrabi and Ali Sohrabi were, according to reporting, not on amicable terms, and she had feared for her safety. That fear was communicated to Gardáí. The record shows a woman who used every legal tool available to her: a Garda complaint, a court application, a protection order. None of it was enough. On the morning she was killed, her alleged killer arrived at the IPAS centre with wounds to his own neck, was spoken to by staff, and then led officers to where her body was.

Ali Sohrabi has been charged with murder and has appeared before Galway District Court. He is remanded in custody. Masuma Sohrabi is dead. Her two children, who walked to school in Clifden each morning, no longer have a mother.

The system that produced this outcome

The Sohrabi case is not an isolated failure of individual officers or individual decisions. It is the visible end-point of a systemic pattern that the State’s own data has been documenting for years, and which the relevant ministers have declined to address in structural terms.

5 → 5,725 Incidents recorded across IPAS accommodation centres: 5 in 2021, rising to 5,725 in 2025. The IPAS population grew approximately fivefold over the same period. Incidents grew more than a thousandfold. Source: Department of Justice data released to Deputy Peádar Tóibín.
544 Cases in which a person responsible for an incident at an IPAS centre was transferred to a different IPAS centre rather than removed from the system. Source: Department of Justice.
124 IPAS residents whose accommodation was withdrawn due to serious or repeated breaches of house rules over two and a half years — across a network housing 33,000 people. Source: Irish Examiner / Department of Justice.
4,127 Warning letters issued in 2025, up from 3 in 2021. A letter. Source: Department of Justice data released to Deputy Tóibín.
7 Deaths arising from critical incidents in IPAS accommodation in 2024 alone. Source: RTÉ / Department of Justice figures.

The ratio that explains the Sohrabi case is this: 5,725 incidents, 124 evictions, 544 transfers. For every person removed from the system over the past two and a half years, more than four were simply moved to a different address within it. The threat did not leave. It relocated.

Citywest: what 1,012 incidents looks like

Citywest is the largest single IPAS centre in Ireland, a 764-bed complex in west Dublin. Freedom of Information requests have produced its incident logs. Between January 2023 and June 2025, Citywest recorded 1,012 incidents. In the first six months of 2025 alone, there were 170 incidents: more than 60 acts of aggression, 19 assaults involving groups of between two and four residents, incidents of assault against staff, drug possession, vandalism and theft.

These are not numbers from a functioning residential facility. They are numbers from an unmanaged environment where the State is paying €92 per person per night — more than two and a half times what it pays per night in its own directly managed accommodation — and receiving, in return, a level of order that would not be tolerated in any other publicly funded setting.

Women inside the system

The Sohrabi case is the most visible instance of a safety pattern that runs throughout the network. An Echo Live investigation based on complaints data found that women in IPAS centres had been solicited for sex by other residents and were fearful of speaking up due to concerns about their immigration status. Of 113 complaints reviewed in one period, 30 related to safety issues involving other residents specifically.

More than 335 complaints were made by IPAS residents about their accommodation in a recent period, including allegations of sexual abuse, physical assault, and racial discrimination. A proportion of those complaints were made by women about male residents. The system’s response, as the data shows, was overwhelmingly administrative: a warning letter, or a transfer.

Masuma Sohrabi did not rely on the complaints process. She went directly to Gardáí. She went to court. She obtained a legal order. The man she feared was nonetheless available to travel from Mayo to Clifden and was in the area on the morning she died. The protection order that was supposed to keep her safe could not survive the geography of an accommodation network in which a transfer is the standard response to a threat.

The Garda data

Gardáí logged 69 calls related to IPAS accommodation in 2023 and 2024 combined — 24 in 2023, 45 in 2024 — with a further 18 logged in just the first four months of 2025. Those are calls to Gardáí from IPAS-adjacent incidents. They do not capture incidents that were handled internally, incidents that were not reported, or incidents that the system categorised as management matters rather than crime. The Gript investigation based on three IPAS centres over a four-month period found records of physical violence, threats against staff, arson claims and psychotic episodes across a period the Department described as routine.

Minister of State Colm Brophy told the Oireachtas that 61 critical incidents had been recorded in IPAS accommodation in 2025, already exceeding the full-year 2024 total of 57, with two resulting in the deaths of residents. Critical incidents include violence toward staff or other residents, as well as mental health crises and self-harm. The State is running an accommodation network in which people die from violence directed at them by other residents, at a rate the Department considers a routine annual data point.

The duty of care question

When the State takes a person into its accommodation — whether in a prison, a hospital, a direct provision centre or an IPAS facility — it assumes a duty of care toward that person. Masuma Sohrabi was in State accommodation. The State knew, from her Garda complaint and from the court order she obtained, that she was at risk from a specific named individual who was also in State accommodation. The State’s response was to move that individual to different State accommodation, from which he apparently retained the ability to reach her.

The question of whether the State met its duty of care to Masuma Sohrabi is not a rhetorical one. It is a legal and administrative question that will, presumably, be examined in the course of the murder trial and in whatever review follows. The broader question — whether an accommodation network running 5,725 incidents a year and responding with transfers and warning letters is structurally capable of meeting its duty of care to anyone inside it — is one the Government has not yet been required to answer in direct terms.

The silence

Masuma Sohrabi fled Iran and came to Ireland in October 2024. Whatever she was fleeing, she ended up in a State accommodation system that was unable to protect her from a man inside the same system who had already been identified as a threat to her. The political response to her death has been, largely, to treat it as a criminal justice matter and wait for the trial.

That framing is insufficient. The criminal justice process will determine what Ali Sohrabi did and what sentence follows. It will not examine why the IPAS system’s response to a documented threat against a resident was a geographic transfer. It will not examine the 544 other cases in which the same logic was applied. It will not examine the 5,725 incidents, the 4,127 warning letters, the 7 deaths in 2024, or what combination of management failure, underfunding, and institutional indifference produced the system that Masuma Sohrabi was living inside when she died.

Those questions require a separate process. They have not been asked. The woman who asked every official question available to her — Garda complaint, court application, protection order — and still died, deserves more than a criminal trial for the man charged with her murder. She deserves an accounting for the system that was supposed to keep her safe.

Note on sourcing: Ali Sohrabi has been charged with the murder of Masuma Sohrabi and the case is before the courts. Nothing in this article constitutes a finding of guilt. All incident statistics are sourced to Department of Justice figures released to the Oireachtas, FOI disclosures, and named reporting from RTÉ, the Irish Times, the Irish Examiner and Gript. The Masuma Sohrabi court proceedings and Garda investigation are ongoing.

Get the weekly briefing

The data. The cases. What the political class isn’t saying. Mondays, in your inbox.

Sources

Related investigations